Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Almost Brilliant

I agree with nearly all of the Phillies/Madmen comparisons posted below except for one egregious miscarriage of justice that must be addressed. Comparing Sterling to Amaro is just brutally unfair to Roger. "Time to see what they really got?" We've already seen what Amaro's got: Ibanez, Raul, the second Cliff Lee deal, Blanton, Joe, the bullpen, the bench, and of course Phillippe Aumont.
Posted by at

2 comments:

  1. Lloyd BraunJuly 21, 2010 at 8:57 AM

    I agree that it's not a great comparsion (I concede that 4-6 are the weak part of the line up), but it's the closest I could get to Roger, who needs to be in any MM comparsion. Also, read the first two paragraphs of this article and say that doesn't sound like Roger.

    http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/phillies/20100721_Major_move__With_Moyer_hurt__team_ponders_trade_.html

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousJuly 21, 2010 at 10:35 AM

    True, it does. It also makes me want to vomit.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)